Why Rents Aren’t Falling in Cities

Why Rents in U.S. Suburbs Aren’t Falling as Fast as Cities

For years, renting in the suburbs meant shelling out less than city rents. However, recent data indicates that this traditional disparity is lessening, leading many to wonder why.

 

Suburban rents outpacing urban growth: Certain suburbs of cities like Atlanta, Detroit, and Seattle experienced rent jumps ranging from 15% to 21%. Over the pandemic’s duration, suburban rent growth surpassed city rent growth by approximately 8 percentage points, marking an unprecedented peak. Although suburban rents remain lower on average, the difference has dwindled from 12% in 2019 to just 5.8% in 2022.

The impact of rising home prices: Skyrocketing home prices also play a crucial role in the altered rental landscape. With median home prices exceeding $400,000 and mortgage rates increasing, the typical American finds homeownership less attainable. Consequently, many opt for longer rental durations, reducing the available apartments for newcomers.

Rental construction lags behind demand: Another critical factor is the significant rental unit shortage that predates the pandemic. While the U.S. faced a deficit of approximately 6.8 million affordable rentals in early 2020, construction has since attempted to bridge this gap. Data from 2023 indicates that nearly a million new apartment complexes are underway, aiming to alleviate the shortage over the next couple of years.

➥ THE TAKEAWAY

Why it matters: The traditional gap in rental prices between city centers and suburbs is shrinking. Factors like pandemic-driven migration, soaring home prices, and a shortage of rental units play pivotal roles in this transformation. As new constructions progress, experts anticipate a cooling down of rent hikes, but the changing face of rental economics hints at a more balanced urban-suburban rental landscape in the future.